The "Fact" daily writes:
Today, a citizen of Armenia may be imprisoned today for speech, point of view. More than three dozen (in some cases) The human rights activists are alerted to political prisoners. "The 1900s of the PACE Resolution are given the standards in which cases a person who is deprived of his freedom can be considered political prisoner. Our task is that in almost all cases, when people have been imprisoned on political grounds, there are all the criteria typical of the political prisoner.
For example, according to the PACE resolution, there is a detention of any of the main guarantees under the European Convention, if any other connection, if any other connection, or its conditions are clearly proportionate to the crime, which a person was found guilty of fulfillment. In our reality, people who are in prison are in prison are detained, the worst means of failure, and detention from the precautionary measure has become a punitive measure. It is noteworthy that these people, as a rule, even charges on medium weight or light crimes, in which case the detention is generally not possible. But we have a reality when there are no political grounds for serious crimes, people go free, because in their case, other types of restraint, collateral or home arrest. Meanwhile, there is a detention of an opposition political person, "Meloyan told" fact ".
One of the criteria typical of political prisoners, he separates it when a person with political motives is stored in discriminatory conditions. "Next, if the detention is the result of obvious unfair procedures, it is an apparent to the political motives of the authorities. For example, the works of "18 righteous people", the works of Bishop and Samvel Karapetyan. As of today, we have more than 3 dozen political prisoners on extremely absurd grounds. The trials have passed the level of Shrishak, this is a legal disgrace, all these works will pass not only in the history of Armenian legal history, but also in the history of global law. The specialist of the international law included in Samvel Karapetyan expressed surprise in this case, he directly described the trial, which is a staged trial, when the prohibition of conscience and denial of discrimination, people were directly condemned to all that. We have the fundamental right defined by the Constitution, a ban on discrimination and a number of human rights, which without hesitation in our country is violated exclusively with the will of political authorities.
This is not only the fulfillment of whims and is not restrained by the opposition, this is a more global problem. The law enforcement authorities allow themselves to falsify the factual circumstances, as the law enforcement officers were mitted, and spent different words and edges to question the authority of these people, and to qualify for people as a terrorist. Not before the beginning of the trial, the stone did not leave the stone from that disgraceful work. In the initial stage of this case, lawyers are ungrateful, because they cannot achieve justice by the realization of the right. I think each of them has been so easy to justify the foundations and reasons for justifying these people so that the Blackness is able to prove to the fact that they are the true and righteousness of their client. We are dealing with classical political persecution. But the problem is more global. With the implementation of their political whims, these people have a serious blow to the pillars of justice, the rule of law in decades. The judiciary took place and prompted by prestigious European structures in the revolutionary period of appreciation for its a number of reforms. And now we have a situation where this government is established success, reforms and achievements in decades, "our interlocutor said.
According to him, when there is political expediency, the judges obvious, in addition to the influence of the judiciary, which is a clear violation of the principle of separation of the authorities, for example, not to work on the e-mailing system. "Only more than three dozen are our political prisoners. Unfortunately, during the last seven years, we will say without hesitation, have hundreds of political prisoners, even if we take into account the detainees as a result of political actions. And those who have been arrested and long-term sentenced will reach a hundred by hundreds. When we have so many precedents, we can raise patterns as a result of them. For example, which judges are under pressure and meet the requirements of the government?
We have a pattern of articles on what kind of accusations against people with opposition political views are being used. We clearly have a pattern of the nature of the nature of the nature of human freedoms, targeting the possibility of silencing a person in terms of his political views. This government proclaimed "Bastades of Democracy", "Succeeded", "succeeded" to violate all the pillars of this democracy openly and violated and violated. These people did not know that they should not identify the position that they occupy, and that position and the seat not only provide a number of responsibilities and responsibilities arising from those functions and rights. They exploit their positions, which is obviously profitable on one hand, our state system is beneficial, but on the other hand, this is a clear repressive, regressive regression for the terms of our state and statehood.
The basis of the rule of law, the principles of legality and the rule of law, have been openly violated by a number of high-ranking officials, who has been called by Nikol Pashinyan, and by prosecution of the Church, as he can only take actions that allow him to the Constitution and the Law. And they not only did not authorize himself with such opportunities, but also restricted himself from such actions. The political or constitutional crisis situation is that the actions of these people are disappearing and unpunished, and they are in the environment. This is being changed to our state regime. These management methods are specific to the authoritarian regime, "the human rights-constitutionist said. Meloyan also proves that it is obvious that international organizations, international partners are incomparably tolerant of these authorities. "But that silence also has a very expensive price for themselves, because due to silence, they are discredited as a result of decades. When closing eyes and ears against obvious anti-legal processes, it has its price, which is very expensive. Conventions have been created in time, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, based on the European Court of Human Rights.
Now it is possible that the institution of political sympathy or mutually beneficial cooperation is operating, but I am convinced that they also realize that this silence has value. I am also convinced that, in the end, the limit of that silence will be crossed. That silence is not absolutely violated, for example, it was violated very scandalously, when defamation and insults were criminalized, and due to political views, they were charged again. The heads and representatives of a number of international organizations started criticizing the Armenian government. The situation was the same in the point of view that the government that was the most opposition was to decriminalize defamation and insult, came and criminalized the legal mechanism for itself a political control tool. In the new Criminal Code, this government allowed itself to provide the reincarnation of defamation and insulting article, and the hooliganism article became the legal basis for the opposition for these authorities. The government of our country has been able to have international law, fundamental fundamental rights, institutions, and it remains a direct comparison of Azerbaijan's behavior. In a number of prestigious structures, such as the ECHR, the Armenian side, the Armenian side is winning, but Azerbaijan is always imperfect. International organizations punish them through sanctions to maintain the reputation of their structures. In today's reality, international law has been mutilated, and this defense has become a result of political manipulation, when they have political expedients, mutually beneficial agreements, make them the values stated and made. But as a result, they will pay the most expensive price. Now, for example, we are dealing with an international arbitration in Samvel Karapetyan's case. Samvel Karapetyan had a victorious decision by arbitration. If the application of the applicant's intermediate measure is satisfied, this is the victory of the plaintiff and the defeat of the defendant, no matter how much the government tries to mislead the public. In this case, the plaintiff is Samvel Karapetyan, the respondent is the Government of the Republic of Armenia.
Also, in the face of various officials, they gave an anti-legal assessment of Samvel Karapetyan's victory, and secondly, they began to be legal an assessment of the arbitration in legal terms, citing public interest. The public interest is defined by our domestic legislation on the arbitration of all parties to the New York Convention, but it has extremely narrow use and definitely established. Such an extension of this concept and refusal of acts will cause a serious problem in the practice of international arbitration. Now this structure has a problem. International organizations, just by the face of international arbitration, are preparing to sacrifice their reputation, to allow Armenia to form such a precedent.
By referring to the Armenian precedent, almost all countries who have ratified that Convention may return to the implementation of arbitration decisions against them. As a result, this structure will become meaningless. When you are a member of international organizations and ratify the Convention, yes, you are inferior to some of your rights and take extra obligations. If you make the sovereignty the subject of discussion, as it was done in our case, then you must refuse all international conventions, you will leave the membership of all international organizations. I emphasize that this behavior leads us to authoritarian regimes and is a blow to the reputation of our state with their own hands, "Gohar Meloyan concludes.
Lusine Arakelyan
