Political scientist Vladimir MartirosyanIt writes:.
"There are two political realities in Armenia. One of the consumer society has persuaded that the former has robbed their second reality in the face of the political nation, which is convinced that those present are traitors.
These two realities do not achieve their victory in any way. Those who brought the robbery cannot find the robber and return to their authority, and those who have convinced are still unable to finally persuade those who have returned to the robbery they are betrayed by their chenogen. There is no other significant discourse for about four years, there will be no objectively and will not be.
This political configuration does not change about four years and it would be naive to think that before the elections will change over the remaining one year. On the contrary, the pre-election contours in this logic, including external orientation, north-west, the third republic-fourth republic.
These four years have been a huge amount of losses in terms of Armenia, but very short from the point of view of political time. All political attacks are in their place and have not changed from both beliefs and principles. This is especially true in the last two months, when political positions are again underlined in terms of pre-election ambitions.
Non-institutional methods of a change of government have not yielded final and desirable results, as well as at this stage some phobias caused some phobias against the street and the square again.
Therefore, dry political realism forced everyone to position with pre-election political logic. No matter how absurdities, fighting against this government / against electoral processes is unavoidable.
Gyumri became a good example of inevitability. It was in Gyumri, the model of maximum inclusion of opposition political forces, independently, to work with their own electorate and to create a motivation to make a choice. In fact, everyone made a proposal (including leaders) and took them to a relatively high participation, which in turn became an obstacle to collecting 50% for the CP.
This showed that the CP would have lost more than the prior election in the previous elections and the number of votes in the previous elections. What is not important in the near future is essential to what he worked as a barrier.
Fluent in the opposition field contradictions and discourses, no desire to give a tribute to increasing their volume, I would like to mention one important circumstance. The political name of this circumstance is the political and guidance proposal. There is a political proposal and ambition, so there is a process and faith in this process, be a process of impeachment, which can be very serious about the rails or the process of inevitable elections. There is one difference between Pashinyan's impeachment should have a candidate for the prime minister (proposal). At the same time, each opposition candidate who has been held by Pashinyan, which does not have post-election processes, operating system, and the pre-election, electoral and post-election exemption mechanisms can be opened in front of this country.
Pashinyan has two ways, and he clearly perceives or the author of the rules of power or the volumes of memoire at all costs. He will act in the range of this logic and dilemma, and in what range the opposition community who goes to the possible prudence and him / them will show a very short political time and political proposal.
P.S. People have not formed an opinion and ideas of politics and political processes and make it possible through the processes, ideas and values.
