The "Fact" daily writes:
The head of the EU Diplomacy Kaya Kalas made a speech in Yerevan, saying, "The EU and Armenia have never been so close as it is now." This phrase itself is interesting.
In other words, something recently happened, which was especially closer to Armenia and the EU. Before that, such a thing did not happen, and now it happened. What is it about? Let's remember the events of the last month. Which of them impressed Mrs. Kalas so impressed that she felt unprecedented intimacy with Armenia? Samvel Karapetyan's arrest.
Nicole Facebook posts that surprised the whole world. Persecution of clergymen. The "Brave" intrusion of the police to the Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin, who, was fortunately pushed back from the citizens. There is an opposition in Armenia that the authorities have "discovered" that the authorities have resumed. Alen Simonyan's sincere confession that Ali's demand will soon be fulfilled, and Azeris will stay in Armenia.
Both Pashinyan's desire to show a high-ranking cleric. And as encouragement, Kalas brought the following news to Armenia. "The European Commission has adopted a proposal on the EU-Armenia visa liberalization action plan, and when the conditions are fulfilled and the process is over, it will bring the EU and Armenia closer."
Let's put it in this phrase. First of all, what does "liberalization of visa regime" mean? This is an extremely wide wording that can mean both significant or minor relaxations in the process of obtaining a visa. One thing is clear, it is clear about visa regime. The EU gently emphasizes that it is even unnecessary to talk about "without a visa regime".
In addition, that "liberalization", no matter what, Armenians are not promised in the near future. Europe has just "accepted a proposal on the action plan" not any decision. Some conditions have been submitted to Armenia, the fulfillment of which is the price to pay for that abstract "liberalization".
It is not announced what conditions are. Well, the Armenian society will not like the most ridicule that, according to Kalas's statement, even if these conditions are fulfilled, it does not mean the desired "liberalization". It is simply promised to rappel the EU and Armenia.
Thus, the RA MFA has once again denied the refusal of Europeans, at least in the form of a review of the EU's chance. The press service of the Armenian government clarifies that Makron has "supported the agenda of the reforms implemented in Armenia."
What reforms? The reforms that the force tried to implement in Etchmiadzin. The IAEA does not hide its main interests in Armenia. These are: peace agreement with Baku, on any terms (ie Azerbaijan), as well as strengthening Armenia with Turkey as a real representative of the West.
Armenia is interested in the EU as a transit area (not a logistics. Thus, the only thing that Europe really wants Armenia is to stop resisting Turkish pressure.
In this context, it is clear why the attacks on the Church were approved by the EU. If the role of the Christian Church in the Armenian society will be able to explain why the country becomes depending on the Muslim states.
Of course, on the condition that the NSS will continue not to leave Armenian journalists, ask these officials unpleasant questions.
Details in today's issue of "Fact" daily
