The "Fact" daily writes:
The unfortunate statement of the Armenian Foreign Ministry and the issue of violent deportation of Nagorno-Karabakh and the settlement of Nagorno-Karabakh has left the issue of normalization of interstate relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan, not, is not a rational criticism.
In fact, the statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not contain news.
It is not even that the Armenian authorities are trying to justify their position on Artsakh's failure, but in this way the Armenian authorities provide new developments, which seems to be the final "stamp" on their position and what happened.
On the other hand, they also close the topic of the return of the people of Artsakh, which is an important component of restoration of those people's rights. It is no time to spread the announcement, when the points of the agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan are agreed, but there is no significant topic to mention Artsakh.
But the best circumstance here is that the statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is completely baseless, first of all from a legal point of view. See if someone in Armenia wants to dissolve its own LLC or declare bankruptcy, the more complications will have that they will not say.
How does this work that the state unit of the popular referendum was dissolved by a decree?
For example, if Nikol Pashinyan or Vahagn Khachaturyan (or who is in those positions) will decide to sign a decree of dissolving Armenia, Armenia must be dissolved. It is clear that such a decree cannot have legal force. And from this point of view, the Foreign Ministry justifies a very thoroughly justification.
It is clear that both in Armenia and Artsakh are the bearer of the statehood, the state of the state. It is no coincidence that issues related to independence and sovereignty are resolved through referendums.
