"Hraparak" newspaper wrote:
Yesterday it became known that with the statements made by the Chairman of the Investigative Committee in the National Assembly, Argishti Kyaramyan, a criminal proceeding was initiated in the Anti-Corruption Committee under Part 1 of Article 486 of the Criminal Code (interfering with the administration of justice or the investigation of a case) (two episodes). During the October 15 parliamentary hearings, during the dispute between the head of the investigation department and the government deputy Hovik Aghazaryan, Kyaramyan claimed that he was contacted at least twice in the criminal case of Aghazaryan's son, "regarding the return of the cars". "Well, if we are talking about the fight against corruption, patronage, please answer this question," Kyaramyan said. It is noteworthy that the law enforcement bodies did not initiate proceedings on their own initiative, about 15 days after the hearing, the proceedings were initiated on the basis of an application sent to the Anti-Corruption Committee. : And the program was presented by lawyer Hakob Charoyan, who, according to our information, is very close to Hovik Aghazaryan, he was his fellow student. Meanwhile, the well-known dialogue took place in the presence and in front of the chiefs of the forces and the chief prosecutor, and even without the report, proceedings should have been initiated on the same day to find out whether there was abuse of position by the deputy, obstruction of justice, or whether Kyaramyan defamed him. The police say that Aghazaryan swore an oath that he will prove either his innocence, or that Kyaramyan is lying, or if there was an intervention, he hid that fact, which is also punishable by criminal law. is an act.
