The "Fact" daily writes:
Yesterday, what was Pashinyan said in the National Assembly, paragraphing the word with "dance" movements or intense shakings of his body and hands? Well, he said a lot, a lot, water, and a manipulus, full, Pathos, which seemed to be one goal, discuss me, say whatever you want, it should not be discussed about painful issues. It would be frivolous to address this. But a topic, in any case, listened.
The prime minister said that the opposition allegedly accused him and his government that they were "filling a budget." Yes, he was talking about such a convinced tone, both the "exists", allegedly "filled" or left empty. The "exes" were also able to "fill the budget", for example, the "capacity" of the RA budget in 1998-2008 was almost tenilled, reaching $ 2.5 billion from several hundred million dollars. This, if we do not talk about the gross domestic product (GDP), in the same 1998-2008. Second, in this case it is more important. No opposition figure government and Pashinyan is criticized for the fact that the latter are engaged in ensuring the entries of the state budget. This is one of the direct labor commitments of the executive branch in us, the executive branch. So, Pashinyan is making a manipules, saying, he distorts the reality.
There is nothing wrong with providing the state budget entries, "fill", in itself. It is, of course, important and necessary. The main question (also the accusations, which Nikol Pashinyan became distorted) is how and what) is filled with that budget.
The other question is what (or what) it is done, especially what the money collected in the state budget is spent on. After all, "filling the budget" is not an end in itself. In no way is it not an end in itself. Nikol Pashinyan and his cardinal government are more and more firm about the Tax Cheapock of the Society, especially small and medium-sized businesses (let us forgive us for that expression). The society, and the business, is the most pronounced protest and actions of the same government's No. 1 in order, and the other aspirations against citizens, but against citizens, other pockets. "Moving" to set taxes from the government desires.
We don't talk about the price of fare, "Will Line", literally from the government's practice. In other words, what is Pashinyan's government filling the budget? He fills in no way unjustified, unjustified, artificially raised taxes, duties and, not to notify the country's debt sharply. Well, why does the government apply for such steps? Ultimately, there are no "chair" in all the workples, at least a few specialists should be. We need and there are. And experts say bitterness that the "fairy tale" of Reapport is over, and the budget revenues are decreasing. As a result, the budget deficit, it is very possible to turn into a complete gap. Even an increase in foreign debt here may not help, because some of it goes to service the other loans taken before it.
Today, Armenia's economy is really reminiscent of a disadvantaged borrower on a credit needle that it takes debt to pay other creditors. Well, why does the Pashinian government make new debts? Why is it adding tax burden? There is no secret. The tax burden is increasing, because there are no expectations of budget revenues, and people in some way, as saying, pay taxes and duties. Not only businesses. We all pay the rest of the price through the price of price. Ultimately, all this from our pockets and, as they like to say, and where the money goes to the taxes paid by the "hero-taxpayers". That's not a secret.
For example, huge measures are spent on Pashinyan's residence and his "family" business trips, on Pashinyan's bodyguard service and necessary fuels. Huge measures are being spent on tourist "business trips" of his teammates, even more, on the meaningless bonuses of this whole "army". In short, the well-being of Nikol Pashinyan's and other incutes. In short, none of them say that the budget fills, in general, is a bad thing. On the contrary, it is important. But that's why there is a way, not everyone choking everyone, suppressing, bankrupting.
Who needs the "filled" budget if tens of hundreds, thousands of businesses claim, to close business, become unemployed, many citizens, unemployed. What is the benefit of "budget" if the real income of people should fall as a result, people should sit on "dry vermicelli" and "salved oil" scene, the "chair" of the Prime Minister's position.
Armen Hakobyan
