"We applied to the prosecutor's office to find out how it happened that the contents of my phone ended up in the hands of third parties. Moreover, we know that it appeared not only to Mr. Prime Minister, but also to other persons. Not to mention that publicity has taken place at the level of the CP department and faction."PastinfoHovik Aghazaryan, an independent member of parliament expelled from the CP, said in a conversation with
"The prosecution appealed to the Anti-Corruption Committee, they rejected the process of initiating proceedings from there. Then, we turned to the supervising prosecutor, they also replied that they did not see grounds. Now we have applied to the court so that the court can compel the relevant authorities to initiate proceedings regarding the disclosure of personal data."
According to Aghazaryan's record, his phone was seized as part of the incident involving Argishti Kyaramyan and his participation, but according to the court's decision, only the body conducting the proceedings could get acquainted with the contents of the phone. "The court said that you, dear investigator or your superior, can get acquainted, but not to pass it on to the prime minister or other persons. As a citizen, I am not interested in how some people or the Prime Minister obtained any information that contains information or pictures that threaten the state. I am not interested in this, how can they get it, it concerns the state, I am okay here, but the other things are inhuman," Aghazaryan said.
When asked if he was not offended by his former team's treatment of him, he replied that he was proud to have been on that team because the majority of that team treated him properly. "The majority did not allow themselves to go down and read the correspondences containing personal data, they simply listened to the "Pavlikmarozovs" who allowed them to read them. Therefore, I am proud to have been with such citizens, as for the Prime Minister, Mr. Prime Minister could have been informed, but not published, he could have called me, he said: Mr. Aghazaryan, you are a big man, it is inconvenient, don't do stupid things. but let's separate again: state secret and narrow personal domain. I would not have imagined such a thing in my wildest dreams, there is no such thing in the books I have read, in the stories I have heard about Stalin's number 37, I have not come across such a thing, it was unacceptable," said Aghazaryan.
