The "Fact" daily writes:
Pashinyan, in addition to the troubles he has brought, both inside the country, whether abroad continues to disgrace our country, our people ...
The Republic of Armenia has had 4 heads over the past 35 years, including Nikol Pashinyan, who holds the post of Prime Minister. Previous leaders, Levon Ter-Petrosyan, Robert Kocharyan, Serzh Sargsyan are quite different people, with their worldview, mindset and approaches.
Moreover, each of us can have (we) (we have) a very different attitude towards each other, moreover, and they are often extremely terrible.
In this case, this is not the question, but the fact that in case of any of the previous leaders, we are not ashamed of our country, our state. Let's repeat, regardless of the tenure of each of them, and after his tenure, what specific attitude did we have?
Regardless of their mistakes, the shortcomings, which, of course, there have been. But when they "sat up" with the leaders of other countries, when our state presented in the world, international organizations and organizations, we will never be ashamed. We don't even mention, for example, the enemy's Azerbaijani leaders about negotiations.
We are not saying, we are proud or something like that, although in some cases, there could be such a feeling.
We note that because of any of the previous leaders or behavior, we have not been a reason to feel bad or uncomfortable for our country, our state, our nation, our people.
We have not been shit in the world. And Nikol Pashinyan seems to be a walking incarnation in the Danish genius film. "Among you disgrace the respublika."
Afterwards, he left for Moscow to attend the 80th anniversary of the victory in Estonia and attended the 80th anniversary of fascism and attended the military parade in the Red Square. With his "Specific" cap.
The point there came there that when Pashinyan appeared on his own hat on the Red Guide for the heads of the official delegations, the commentator of "Rossia 1" was confused that "we see the Azerbaijani leader ... sorry about the Prime Minister of Armenia."
Some say that the commentator was specially confused, that is, they had planned. But even if so, it's much worse than if it's just been a slip of language.
Probably China's leader was confused that Pashinyan did not notice him to greet him. Pashinyan himself was confused when Russian President Putin greeted the guests on the stale of the palace before the solemn sitting.
Pashinyan welcomed and wanted to get up at stairs, but Putin made a gesture that "you are going in the wrong direction, Nikol Vova!" It was symbolic, of course.
However, not only the cameras were caught, but also the Russian media outlets that Pashinyan had a dissatisfied statement, emphasized that he was "not on his plate".
And in Armenia, many people who have been killed in the Great Patriotic War, it was more unpleasant that the Azerbaijani troops committed against the Armenians passed through the Red Square, and Aliyev, for example, did not accept Putin's invitation and did not go to Moscow.
And more than a hundred heroes, marshalons, admiral, many generals and hundreds of thousands of fighters in the Great Patriotic War, represented by the Armenian army, was absent.
That's really a disgrace. Meanwhile, it had a political context. And it is characteristic that Armenia, to emphasize the Armenia headed by Pashinyan and the Armenia was neglected. And what is there inside?
Pashinyan had another session of "loss of self-control" in the National Assembly. They asked Pashinyan about the head of the district (head of the administrative district) of the district (administrative district) of the district (administrative district) of the district (administrative district) of the district's party, even a political assessment of that disgrace.
Pashinyan (again) lost self-control, the opposition deputies threatened to threaten the "padvals" of the National Security Service, and showed a non-ambiguous gesture of cutting, and he began to shout, using the word "kiss".
That everyone saw, including the enemies of our country and people. They saw nearby neighbors and possible allies, saw the European Union and others. Do you think anyone will have a serious deal with the representatives of such a person who has such a manager or such a leader?
It is not the behavior of the head of state. This is a behavior for which even the head of state "dismisses" from the case ...
Armen Hakobyan
