After this recent article, I am pleased to prove that our partners also returned the discussions on the substantive and argument field, at least in the format of the entrance to the entrance to the Level.
They also understood the fact that in the sense of content discussions, it is not necessary to be detained, because in this case I am a "weapon" review of the argumentized claims, not the formats of submitting them. Of course, if I could personally and on the air, I would have strongly impressed their emotional impression, but not the depth of what to say.
Thank you for the wishes of freedom at the same time, especially since I was later freedom, I have discussed this, the topic of dismissing each other with the representatives of the second president.
After this introduction to the rules of the epistoliarian genre, let me go to the original Saying, which to facilitate the reader's case, I will present the chronological analysis of the theses set by our partners.
And so.
1. 1998-2008. The term of office of the second president, of course, is full of difficulties, challenges, tragic events, but also to overcome the success of Armenia's external, safe, defense, economic spheres, the Republican Party has compiled. As a political support of the second president, the leaders of the government of those years (Vazgen Sargsyan and Andranik Margaryan) with a key role in key security and political officials (Serzh Sargsyan). As a reliable ally of Robert Kocharyan's nomination and victories in the elections of 1998 and 2003. Therefore, the success of the second president's tenure, about which our partners are so loved to remind themselves, as well as the problems raised by the public, are also ours.
2. 2008-2018. The attempts of our partners to present that period as the second president, and the years to speak, to put it mildly, do not have the reality.
And the strongest argument here, the second president, said years ago, that he was not going to become the youngest pensioner in Armenia. Said and did. During those 10 years, President Kocharyan's submission was emphasized in the political life of Armenia and it was mainly directed against President Sargsyan's policy. This was about his public statements on various occasions, the poisonous anti-propaganda of some of the political power of some political forces, defamation and blackmail from Nicole's thread, defamation and blackmail. (By the way, one of those who worked in one of those sites that supported the second president, one of the unrighteous obligatory against the third party occupies the position of the Secretary of State of the Republic of Armenia. (Sovepadenia?)
Moreover, in September 2011, President Kocharian stated that he did not rule out his return to his return. Or maybe in the three-year-old three-member actions against the third president, they were also a coincidence with President Kocharyan at the time of aggressive actions against the third president. Do not know this period, regretting that during that time, the level of misinformation and anti-propaganda does not allow one side to appear as a "target" or "victim".
3. March-May 2018. I thank our colleagues that they actually admitted that "Serzh's Agh Nicole" false claims and its consistent spread of their work camps were carried out. We were also amazed at where that myth Maidan came and still naively discuss the issue with our opposition partners. I can imagine how they had fun in my nation. I want to be honest about why that false and insidious anti-propagation was directed against us, which was the motive of such a suspicious trick from our back. After all, many of our partners, not Sargsyan, were in 2018 in the excreted rows of "Serzh deniers" in 2018. After all, they did not delve from the chance to dismiss the third president with Nicole's hands. After all, it was actually at the heart of the geopolitical center of them.
After all, what have we sinned that after "rejecting Serzh" they could not "peruse" the "revolution"? After Serzh Sargsyan's resignation, the events did not go to the scenario they wanted. After the Republican Party of 2018, they did not take advantage of the Republican, self-employed Nicole. In the famous capital, they thought that nothing, they would find a language with Nikol, a kuda on the principle.
Even after the loss of Artsakh, some of your talks claim that "Serzh's rejection was right, Nicole's prime ministry was wrong," with self-deception and at least retrospective that it was the same stages of Armenia's operation.
By the way, in those days the wording expressed by President Kocharyan, the wording that "the government is not a suitcase to transfer to Pashinyan," you remember when it was done. Let me say: On April 29, 2018, 6 days after Serzh Sargsyan's resignation. Can I ask: If you were against Sargsyan's resignation, why didn't it be publicly supported?
4. Extraordinary elections of 2021. Retrospective assessments of this period were also surprised by me. First of all, to win the elections in 2026, the Republican was not compelled to the dissemination of the same history in 2021.
Moreover, remember, please that when you wanted to go to the election, we still asked you not to accuse us of allegedly, we are afraid to go against Nicole. I know 100% that the RPA's decision at the last minute, participated in the elections (what I have voted against) has been fully acceptable by the second president. And now you tell us that we "prevented your mathematics". How? That we did not participate, you would win Nicole. After all, the same second president said at his last press conference that there would be no synergy from our hypothetical union that our and your voters are different that some of our votes are unavailable (and vice versa).
So guys dear, you talk to you. We are bad, "ex", we lost twice in the elections, "We brought it to Nicole" ...
I don't even write about 2026. I repeat, President Kocharyan knew the approaches of President Sargsyan and the Republican Party before the press conference. And, however, our, timely project, and now, the cause of active manifesting disagreements is somewhere else. Can they be a consequence of local deformities from global geopolitic shifts?
I don't know, it will think ...
Instead of posts. In any normal countries, the small, former presidents are national wealth. Everyone. Regardless of political and ideological differences. Both the first, the second or the third. With their experience, knowledge, ties, wiseness and deposit. And now do not blame me for being "Levon". The ear of the "Bourgeois Democratic Revolution" will call. Especially since the ANC's partners have been hosted for me, your flagship media pavilions for a long time more often than the Republicans. And I listen to them too.
Armen Ashotyan
RPA Deputy Chairman
"Dzoraghbyur" TCC
01.03.2025
