Euromedia24 on Play Store Euromedia24 on App Sore
BNB

$870.47

BTC

$113082

ADA

$0.868816

ETH

$4608.63

SOL

$213.76

31 °

Yerevan

20 °

Moscow

45 °

Dubai

20 °

London

26 °

Beijing

23 °

Brussels

16 °

Rome

23 °

Madrid

BNB

$870.47

BTC

$113082

ADA

$0.868816

ETH

$4608.63

SOL

$213.76

31 °

Yerevan

20 °

Moscow

45 °

Dubai

20 °

London

26 °

Beijing

23 °

Brussels

16 °

Rome

23 °

Madrid

The ECtHR actually recorded in the judgment in the "Suren Antonyan v. Armenia" case that Karen Andreasyan was biased. lawyer


The European Court in the judgment in the case of "Suren Antonyan v. Armenia" actually recorded that while considering the petition regarding Judge Antonyan, the President of the Court of Justice Karen Andreasyan was biased and thus did not recuse himself, as a result of which the judge was removed from the judicial system.

About this on Facebookwrote on his pagelawyer Raffi Aslanyan.

"Of course, the European Court obliged to reopen the case, but it is obvious that the actions of the former President of the Central Committee of Ukraine Karen Andreasyan have the characteristics of an apparent crime and it should receive a proper criminal-legal assessment.

It is clear that regarding the other judges removed due to the personal complaint of the same subject, other legal acts of the European Court creating a criminal offense will be received soon, but at the moment there are sufficient grounds to initiate criminal proceedings against Karen Andreasyan," he noted.