"Fact" daily writes:
Before almost every election, this time, once again, conversations about the "I'm against everyone" thesis become active. Moreover, we should note that we are not talking about the initiative (party) of the same name, which may have good goals deep down.
We are talking about the mentality itself, the active spread of the mentality of "against everyone" among the society. However, the point is that such an approach itself means... threading the coil of Nikol Pashinyan's rule.
This is also recorded by many experts. We are not saying that this is necessarily the goal. But, willy-nilly, it is beneficial exclusively to the current government. Why?
The first is because the idea of rejecting all implies promoting passive voter participation.
And that, singularly, is beneficial to the authorities, because the less voters participate, the better for the authorities. In the case of passive or low participation, the number of those who are "arrested" by the authorities with administrative resources becomes crucial.
Meanwhile, one of the key issues related to the upcoming elections is to activate and motivate the passive, to achieve the highest possible and active participation of our compatriots in the voting. Secondly, what did he say "against everyone?"
Now this is the palette available in our current political field. Eh, if you don't find strength with your heart in that stretch, then find like-minded people and form yours. They will not come from "outside" and "save" us.
And then, to put it mildly, it is strange to be "against everyone" in a situation where it is not even specified who exactly are among those "everyone", what forces, how many there are, etc.
The details are in today's issue of "Past" daily newspaper
