The "Fact" daily writes: Everyone wants peace. This phrase, especially today, is almost constantly discussed. This is, of course, natural and logical. But there are a number of nuances here.
But before that, Nikol Pashinyan and his preachers have been absolutely abused by the "Credit" of their campaigns exclusively in the upcoming election. Oh, Mr. Pashinyan predicted that the upcoming elections will be between "peace and non-peace". And although we have already touched upon it, there is probably a need to consider this problem more detail. In general, in the case of our country, what is peace? At least all normal people, most people and societies prefer or want to live in peace.
Although historical facts and realities suggest that the history of mankind is a history of wars. It turns out that even the current civilization has been found in the thousands of years without wars, that is, in peace, in peace. And the most pessimists are mocked that these 290 years are conditioned by the fact that people were just fighting against post-war infections, epidemics and disasters.
Now let's go back to our concrete reality in history and seeking the eyes of that reality exclusively, b) Peace has already taken place, c) The scoundrel, massacres, crimes, and inhumanities that the latter have allowed our people and our country.
But ... Do neighboring countries want peace? At least two neighboring countries, Azerbaijan and Turkey, have no such goals. In the case of Azerbaijan, everything is very open and simple. Literally on the same day, when Pashinyan signaled "Peace on Peace", Ilham Aliyev announced the preparation of the war, to make new weapons, and to form new special units.
Turkey's policy towards Armenia's territory to be turned into a "Turkic corridor" in absolute or vassal, economic and political dependence on Armenia (denial of the Armenian Genocide, "Dissolution of the Armed Forces, the withdrawal of Armenians, the withdrawal of the Russian military base, and so on. By and large, this is the "peace" imagined by Pashinyan. Of course, you can find other names for self-destruction, but the public hearing is probably the word "peace". In that case, what is the matter of peace, specific, Armenia and our society? It is that if you want peace, you must be ready for war.
If we open the brackets a little, in the conditions of Armenia, the realities of our country, peace can be ensured by the following preconditions: Economic development and ensuring continued progress, modernization of the army, military, and high-air combatination and improvement, the provision of cooperation with foreign and possible allies, the community's unity or internal solidarity and the potential of all Armenians, scientific-educational progress and development. All this is understandable, based on national historical, cultural, traditional values, at the same time, at the same time, we have neighbors that take into account the real possibility of force and organized to apply it, not to the toasts. Moreover, at least two aggressive neighbors, whether anyone never poses a human being in front of them, is treated to themselves, they are happy to serve or understand that they can serve the whims of the other.
This is the same in the relations between individuals, it is the same in the relations between the states. He will appoint a gradual change in the demographic image of Armenia as a graduality of the state, with all its highest consequences.
Yes, Pashinyan said is "peace." Look, now, for example, it is peaceful in Artsakh, too peaceful. The same "peace" also threatens the Republic of Armenia if the political forces do not exercise the real public mood. Otherwise, yes, everyone wants peace.
The whole question is who "puts" under it.
Armen Hakobyan
