As a result of the monitoring of the Human Rights Defender's Office, the group's initiative of the Five Human Rights Defender touched upon the statement of the Human Rights Defender, making an assessment of the defender's activities.
We consider it necessary to monitor the protection of the rights of the child's rights and the maintenance of the provisions of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Human Rights of the Human Rights Defender. There are many attempts to make perceptions about the latter's secondary, and often contributing to the legal actors in the legal sphere. We consider it necessary to emphasize that this practice is inadmissible, and the obstruction of the Human Rights of the Human Rights in any way or forming misunderstandings in this authority is prohibited by international standards. Naturally, this issue should become a subject of discussion by the competent authorities.
We consider human rights unacceptable, especially for children's questions and children's "use" to carry out public attention and public attention. We emphasize once again that making children vulnerable and taking into account their best interests should be ruled out and no player can hinder the activities of the Human Rights Defender and the Ombudsman in Armenia.
We consider it inadmissible to exploit the contents of the Ombudsman's statement, where the formulations on the partner lawyer and other actors are provided with adequate sensitivity and ethics norms.
As for the issue of detention in the case, any lawyer who operates in Armenia is best aware of the legislative ban on the Human Rights Defender, not interfering with the activities of judges. Therefore, the defender is obvious that the lawyer has the lack of a decision on a specific case that has decided to make a decision on the court. Moreover, any lawyer is aware that there are many cases in the world when women are deprived of liberty, in a number of cases, having children. This is not a case of uniqueness, and the question needs to be addressed to discuss all the details and circumstances of the incident and to form a final position, not to acquire public dividends. This issue is in the focus of the Human Rights Defender and reaffirms our approach that it will not be submitted publicly without forming the point of view of sufficient justification. As a result of the analysis of the necessary information, the protector's position will soon be presented in the near future.
The Defender is committed to providing support to both the detainees and the rights of his child and the partner lawyer if necessary.
As for other rights issues in the mentioned case, some of them have been resolved in terms of the human rights defender intervention.
We are drawn to the attention of the Chamber of Advocates that Advocacy as human rights activities can be successfully implemented exclusively in the case of protecting the requirements of human rights requirements and the formation of human rights. Meanwhile, by lawyers to prevent the Human Rights of the Human Rights, the manifestation of the same laws on different occurrences of the same group must be made by the community and the body presenting the same group. Moreover, the Human Rights Defender and the Human Rights Defender did not allow themselves to communicate with the norms of ethics, regardless of its different views and situation. It is unfortunate that various lawyers are conducting communication with representatives of the Human Rights Defender, which is not only appropriate for its legal partners, but also not acceptable from the point of view of the ethics of ordinary communication.
We remind again that both the Human Rights Defender and the Human Rights Defendants are constantly maintained by presenting sensitivity to lawyers or during communication, regardless of all circumstances and situations.
The Defender always maintains sensitivity and ethics norms to various lawyers and public defenders not only when discussing the chamber partners, but also by those who have deprived them of liberty.
At the same time, we express our gratitude to the many lawyers who contribute to the solution of human rights in Armenia with their fellowship and professional work. Your work is invaluable in terms of creating appropriate perceptions of human rights in Armenia and guarantee many people's rights.
