The "Fact" daily writes:
"Pay, Little Serve", "Mandatory Service is only for the boys of the socially vulnerable", "the foundations of the army are being demolished."
These are only a small part of the comments when the society responds to the bill developed by one of the collection of the collection of 18 and 24 million drams to pay the state budget and served as 4 and 1 months, respectively. This project should have been discussed at the special sitting of the NA Standing Committee on Defense and Security yesterday.
The discussion was canceled, on the grounds of the deputy chairman of the commission that there are issues of urgent discussion. Recently, the Ombudsman called for social justice, the risks related to social fairness in the army, as well as proposed to consider the issue of international obligations undertaken by the constitutional and state.
Vitaly Mangasaryan, head of the "Basic" Analytical Center, first of all, first refers to the cancellation of the sitting of the commission. "Since the opposition deputies were more than the rulers seemed to be the reason.
It is clear that there would be no positive conclusion by the opposition, probably the current task of the current. Now, about the bill. In my opinion, this is a terrible and destructive bill, especially in the long run. This bill is that the actual corruption is legalized.
The ruler of the bill is said, before the army, the army, now, now we will legalize that money that provided this or that official with corruption mechanisms. It turns out that they are not able to fight against corruption. It turns out that this or that person who will benefit from that bill in the future is a very likely person to a prone to the crime.
If I have to give that money by a corruption mechanism, I now give a legal way, but it turns out that this inclination was not in me that I was taking that step. In other words, it turns out that the large part of the law users is a potential criminal. On the other hand, lawyers even see a problem with the Constitution, "Mangasaryan told" fact ". It emphasizes that layering in the society will deepen. "It will take that the rich, the people who have money will serve, will not protect the borders of the Republic of Armenia, our sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the person who does not have money will go to fulfill his duty.
This is a terrible big stratification of ourselves without it in a difficult society. In this context, in some stage, commercial banks will respond. As they provide student loans, in the future, let's say, statements and advertisements may see that this or that bank offers loans to get rid of the army.
Where we go this way, we increase the capacity of our armed forces with this step or reduces it. Let me tell more about 10-apatty, 15-apatty weaken. Even talking about this system, discussing us, if we are discussing such an absurd and destructive law, it is no longer brought to us, nor does our interlocutor.
According to Mangasaryan, even the people who have the rest of the mind must be against all this in the internal team. "I hope that the public reaction should force the authorities not to take destructive steps. It's enough, but through trials we have passed through a great deal of experience. In the case of the bill, there is an absolute lack of justifications, there is no logical justification.
Even the Minister of Defense says during the government session, every year we will decide how many people we will give that privilege. It is a conventional 50 quota, but 100 people apply, with what mechanism will choose how many of those 50 people will be preserved.
Or again, who was soon registered, who found familiar with the option, that is, the logic of more corruption risks. The impression is that they do not imagine how that the law will act.
They also say that now you accept it, the day of the morning you will understand what problems will be, we will improve and then make changes. In this sense, there is a serious problem, because the bills of such fatal significance do not bring the parliament so quickly and try to hold it.
On the other hand, an absolute discussion does not take place with the public sector and expert field. Whoever I know in the field, with whom I communicate, no one knows about anything, learned about this bill from the press. We try to analyze the information in the press. They also submit a justification, we will accept this bill, our conscription will increase by 20%.
This is a Manipul. After paying 24 million drams, the conscript will be in the army for 1 month. It is also a question that what capabilities will be achieved in 1 month. A month later, the state tells himself to go home, you did your duty. We only have that more resource for only 1 month, it will be in just one military unit.
In my opinion, they are even thinking of creating a separate military unit for a special 1-month service in the future, so that so to speak, the army's interpersonal problems do not arise. In other words, in every sense, this law is very problematic, we must do everything possible to bring it to life, it all concerns it.
Regardless of political views, security is a matter of concern to all of us, and we must do everything possible for such destructive laws to be implemented, "says the expert on the military.
For years, the current authorities have been saying to the Armenian society that they are going through a professional army, but it turns out that the foundations of one of the most important circles of the army are weakening. "To be honest, I don't imagine well, how do we imagine it, but if we want to have a professional army, we should have a clear road map, it's not a day or a year. They set the name that they are still doing reforms, but they don't really have to be able to implement the reforms they say. For 3-4 years, the army has to change uniform, so far they are in discussions, they say every year, we will do this year. It is easy to say, a professional army, etc., but they don't have a clear mechanism. In one of his interviews, Nikol Pashinyan said that they were in favor of and accepted the concept of comprehensive defense at the sitting of the National Security Council. It turned out that the government is in favor of that concept and try to go that way. Until today, there is no objective step, that is, the concept of comprehensive defense, if we describe it illustrated, that any citizen must have its position and role in our defense system, but now we are actually 180 degrees. Let's say that the citizens who need their position in that defense system, we say, give me money, get rid of. They once say something, then they go in the opposite direction.
Returning to the bill, I will mention that its justifications are very weak, there is no such logic that there will be no corruption in the case of this mechanism. In case of life of the law, this will lead to the reduction of the number of army, combat readiness. On the other hand, you take parallels here with Aliyev's demands, which says Armenia should not have armed forces. Such bills present in the parliament, and it is impressed that they are packaging and carried out that indirect demand, "Vitaly Mangasaryan concludes.
Lusine Arakelyan
