In fact, the need to change the Constitution in the context of real Armenia has absolutely different significance, although it is impossible to deny that the text of the Constitution will be of regional significance.
The Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan stated this, presenting the real Armenian ideology project.
"The agenda of the new Constitution with the 2018 Revolution was: But then I considered it that this is not feasible. At that time, it was illogical to change the constitution for two months. And it would have been that issue again, the concentration of the parliamentary government or a semi-presidential system.
And it would be very difficult to give the answer to this question, in the conditions where the parliamentary management system operated only for 1-3 months. The Constitution should be the agreement on citizens about the rules of living and relating to the country.
In terms of text, no constitution is problematic. The problem is that the agreement of the citizens did not happen, because the government's adoption both in 1995 was the constitution, but the results of that voting were always questioned, that is, it was legitimate understanding that the people did not vote for it.
Procedures for a long time, we have not decided on the rule of our living because there was an empire. We have not decided on the rule we live, but we have come to Armenia now, but our perception is that we do not decide what the rule we live, "he said.
In the most detailed video.
