"Fact" daily writes:
Nikol Pashinyan's statement that "since 1994, that is, after the cease-fire, since the beginning, the negotiation process has been about returning Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijan," as well as his suggestion that the three former presidents debate with him, received intense reactions.
A small number of official "sazandars" hastened to react in this style: "ugh", "duh", "dump", "zump", the opposition field and impartial political scientists and diplomats once again presented the manipulative nature of his statements. Hundreds of thousands of citizens reacted are either under Pashinyan's post or on their social media pages. Most of them are insults. insults, at least harsh ones, which we will refrain from publishing.
Let's give some examples that are more typical and define the position of most of the public. "You have said many times that you will conduct negotiations on the Artsakh issue from your own point of view.
We are living the result now, you will answer", "It is the real time to resign, at least show courage in this matter", "Herika tuftes, O Pashinyan, tell me what kind of trouble you will bring to my head", "The real Nagorno-Karabakh, Azerbaijani The return to the ranks happened during your time, not during the time of previous presidents, lying is actually good for you", "in that case, 5000 What would you eat a child's head?", "O capitul yant, who takes you seriously enough to debate with you?" and so on.
Another user, after it was revealed that he was "infected" with a quid to "fly" from St. Petersburg, wrote: "With his short brain, he was actually calling the presidents to debate with his neck in order to get infected with covid."
Political scientist Varuzhan Babajanyan's note was also noteworthy. "After taking power and getting acquainted with the negotiation package, yes, you should have invited the former presidents, held consultations, said that for objective reasons you are inexperienced and do not know the situation, asked for some direction in terms of solving the most complex problem, you should have kept in constant contact through advisory channels. with them, developing a lexicon, rejecting "Artsakh is Armenia and that's it" from battle cries, "I'm starting the negotiations from my own point" lopsided exercises, from turning the extremely sensitive national issue into fodder for the ignorant masses...
Oh, in that case, you could easily invite everyone to a debate, nail it to the pillar of infamy for what you brought to my head, why you didn't show me the right path... After all, when you took power, you got a second Armenian state entity endowed with all the attributes of a state. quite well-built, with huge roads and well-functioning structures.
With self-righteous political adventurism and a weak political team, you provoked a war and/or you did nothing to prevent it, in a desperate and disorganized state, you led the course of the war with an inadequate Facebook live, becoming the cause of the tragic death of a significant number of victims, many of whom did not even enter the war. field, and now you invite to debate who is guilty...
Power is certainly a sweet thing, and in order to maintain it, you will certainly continue that inadequate discourse as long as it has its consumer... But there is a limit beyond which the state starts to stink..."
