"Fact" daily writes:
Last week, the second president of RA, Robert Kocharyan, referring to the question of his timely return to politics, in general, whether to engage in politics or not, said: "The country is under such dangers and under such disasters, and that whole picture, yes, made me go back to politics. And until those threats disappear, it is my right and my team's right to engage in politics." Of course, everyone has the right to engage in politics or not. But, in our opinion, the problem here is not only the right, but also the state in which our country is. In this case, the priority is not the right, but the obligation. Now we, our country, are in a more than extreme situation, if not to say that we are facing direct ontological threats, if not under the direct pressure of those threats. In such conditions, the participation of experienced state officials in political processes, if possible, in the governance of the country is extremely important. Let's repeat: we are talking about experienced statesmen. And they not only have the right, but are obliged to participate. In this case, if we consider the specific person, the individual, then whether we like or dislike Robert Kocharyan, we cannot but accept an important fact. we are talking not only about an experienced but also an effective statesman, according to which he has recorded success both in terms of ensuring the security of the state and a real, dignified peace, as well as economic and foreign-political achievements. management should not be a right, but a necessity. Moreover, a commitment. And whether they like it or not, this should be accepted not only by the broad circles of society, but also by the same Robert Kocharyan and not many experienced government figures like him. Look, it's been more than 6 years that we've been seeing and seeing for ourselves what destructions and disasters the coming to power of inexperienced, stateless, irresponsible and adventurers has led to, therefore, our society must one day finally understand that the country's leadership cannot be handed over or entrusted solely with love or not, we must first of all consider who can, who can't, what experience they have, what success-failure they have. we don't ask about, for example, which surgeon we like by his speech or appearance, but first of all, we are interested in what successes he has achieved, how many operations he has performed, with what results. It is a paradox, but, for some reason, when we trust the steering wheel of the country, we are often guided by completely different standards.
