Tigran Abrahamyan writes:
The Ministry of Defense, officially responding to the fact of yesterday's death of a serviceman, announced that "no death has been recorded in the army," adding that "the said incident occurred at the deceased's place of residence, specifically at a livestock farm." At the same time, the Ministry of Defense "clarified" that the deceased was not in service at the time, "the incident is not related to service and cannot be qualified as an accident that occurred in the army."
In other words, the government continues to remain at the same point, in this case, in a quagmire. I continue to insist that the government's efforts are more directed at various tricks, manipulations, and correcting other aspects of the topic than at dealing with the problem itself. It is very likely that the main addressee of this message is not even the public, but directly Nikol Pashinyan, whom Papikyan remotely convinces that the situation is not so hopeless, and that he is on the spot.
It is pointless to argue or convince the public: you are the ones primarily responsible for what has been created. But, after all, a serviceman died. The first task is to find out why. Then, to understand its connection with the service in any way, including from the point of view of what work could have been done to prevent it, from moral and psychological to control. After all, if we say that a serviceman is a value for us, then he is a value not only in the military unit itself or in combat positions, but also during his rest hours.
