Nicole cannot come up with the position of the "heartfelt" followers of the Armenian Apostolic Church. Arthur Vanetsyan. "Hraparak"

"Square"The interview with Arthur Vanetsyan, Chairman of the Homeland Party party, presented it.

"Mr. Vanosyan, although many people say that Nikol Pashinyan's attack on the Church and Catholicos of All Armenians, neither the Church nor his defenders say why the public should talk about the problems in the Church and, if necessary, take steps to overcome them. You also announced on Public Television that these issues are not discussed and that's it. Why?

- Yes, I also tried to avoid discussing personal issues related to His Holiness and high-ranking clergymen in the public domain. But since there are issues left in the air, I try to talk about them shortly. First of all, the issues raised by Nicole are not discussed from a religious point of view. The Church has its own procedures, which envisage discussions on various issues at different levels, and discussions on national issues in the National-Church Assembly.

Such discussions should not be held at the request of Article 34 of the Constitution on Personal Life, which states that "everyone has the right to protect the data related to him." The collection of alleged information about the alleged information about the clergy, both the non-criminal actions and the public discussion violates the above-mentioned procedure. And the intervention of the head of state, the life of the Church, with a statement on the establishment of the leverage of the influence of the influence of the Catholicos in the choice of the Catholicos, violates the constitutional principle and law of the state.

The initiators of this "discussion" against the Armenian Church have already had no such entitight to the legal nor, especially in moral respects. These people are officials who have lost their people who have lost their people and territorial concessions on territorial concessions. Moreover, the public word of the official cannot be vulgar and irresponsible, such as Nikol Pashinyan and his teammates.

- But Nikol Pashinyan and his teammates say they raise the problem as a follower of the Church, the child of the Church ...

- I will continue my mind. The issue cannot be discussed in public reasons, as Nicole cannot come from the position of the "heartfelt" followers of the Armenian Apostolic Church. He does not even participate in the Liturgy of Easter, and on Christmas, it is publicly preparing an omelet with sausage. In fact, that person has nothing to do with the Church, there is no church, and only speculates this issue for its political purposes.

These issues are also not discussed for political reasons. It is obvious that Nikol Pashinyan is not the Catholicos of All Armenians and the high-ranking churches, but targeted the Armenian Apostolic Holy Church. The goal is to put on the enemy's neighbor's orders, to hit the public, which is a more elaborate of the public, and therefore the authorities. By entering the discussion of this issue, we will only contribute to the advancement of the regular agenda of Nicole.

Details source:website:.